Merdeka CentreMerdeka Centre - Tukang Fikir Atau Tukang Pusing?
Merdeka Centre merupakan satu lagi jentera yang digunakan oleh Pakatan Rakyat untuk mencapai impian mereka untuk ke Putrajaya. Ada yang memikirkan bahawa mereka adalah kumpulan pemikir tetapi sebenarnya mereka hanyalah tukang pusing kerana itulah yang kini dilakukan oleh Merdeka Centre untuk PR. Survey dan juga statistik yang mereka lakukan adalah sebenarnya bertujuan untuk mengelirukan rakyat terhadap Umno, BN dan Najib. Target utama mereka adalah Najib kerana beliau merupakan halangan terbesar bagi PR yang mahu memenangi PRU13. Dalam masa-masa yang tertentu, tukang pusing ini mula menyebarkan statistik mereka - Populariti Najib menurun, populariti Najib naik, sekejap turun, sekejap naik, lebih kurang seperti permainan komputer. Mereka cuba untuk menghasut rakyat supaya percaya bahawa survey yang mereka lakukan adalah profesional. Dan apabila tarikh PRU diumumkan, kemungkinan 'survey' baru akan dikeluarkan untuk menceritakan bahawa populariti najib sudah turun, akan kalah, habis. Semuanya untuk menggambarkan bahawa Pakatan Rakyat adalah yang berkuasa. Antara pelanggan-pelanggan utama Merdeka Centre adalah kerajaan PR bagi Pulau Pinang dan Selangor. Tukang pusing ini menjalankan tinjauan berkala bagi Lim Guan Eng dan Khalid Ibrahim dengan bayaran yang lumayan. Mereka meninjau pendapat rakyat terhadap kedua-dua kerajaan negeri tersebut dan ketua bagi kedua-dua negeri. Namun, pernahkah anda terfikir mengapa mereka tidak pernah mengeluarkan maklumat terhadap Menteri Besar bagi kedua-dua negeri tersebut? Apa kata tunjukkan kepada rakyat statistik bagi pendapat rakyat terhadap Anwar Ibrahim? Mengapa tidak keluarkan statistik apabila berlakunya isu video seks yang melibatkan Anwar? Setiap kali demonstrasi Bersih dijalankan, akan ada statistik yang menyatakan bahawa populariti Najib sekejap naik, sekejap turun. Rakyat benar-benar ingin tahu ststistik terhadap populariti Anwar selepas Bersih 3.0. Statistik bagi Nizar Jamaluddin, setelah isu WWW1, Lim Guan Eng setelah kebanyakan bukit di Pulau Pinang dimusnahkan dan tentang Ambiga setelah berlakunya segala keganasan di jalanan. Dasar tukang pusing! Jadi, biarlah kami yang beritahu anda akan perkara yang sebenar. Salah satu daripada arahan yang diterima oleh Merdeka Centre dari salah satu daripada client mereka adalah untuk menjatuhkan imej Najib dan UMNO. Mereka telah lakukan perkara seperti ini selama tiga tahun. Mereka juga mempunyai banyak maklumat terhadap Lim Guan Eng dan Khalid Ibrahim. Walau bagaimanapun, keputusan daripada statistik mereka menunjukkan keputusan yang negatif. Populariti yang mereka peroleh setelah Mac 2008 mula menurun atas segala skandal yang berlaku. Itulah sebab mengapa mereka tidak boleh mengeluarkan sebarang maklumat terhadap pelanggan mereka. Jika mereka benar-benar profesional, mereka tetap akan mengeluarkan segala informasi terhadap pemimpin-pemimpin tidak kira samada dari PR atau BN. Kenapa serang Najib sahaja? Pengarah kumpulan tersebut, Ibrahim Suffian, yang baru sahaja pulang dari Amerika Syarikat dan dia baru sahaja diberi kelulusan oleh kerajaan AS untuk memberi ceramah kepada pegawai-pegawai di Amerika. Dia adalah individu yang dikatakan oleh UMNO sebagai individu yang telah menghasut mantan Perdana Menteri, Tun Abdullah bin Haji Ahmad Badawi untuk mengadakan PRU12 terlalu awal pada 2008. Tun Abdullah telah melantik Merdeka Centre untuk menjalankan kaji selidik untuk beliau dan mungkin dari keputusan keputusan yang diperoleh, beliau kemudiannya berkeputusan untuk menjalankan PRU walaupun beliau masih lagi mempunyai masa setahu. Kesimpulannya, beliau sebenarnya telah diperangkap. Setelah kejadian tersebut, BN tidak lagi mahu mempunyai sebarang hubungan dengan Merdeka Centre. Dan sejak dari itu, Ibrahim Suffian telah menjadi kaki pusing yang lebih hebat. Dia dilantik menjadi penasihat bagi PR dan sering memberikan kata putus bagi beberapa calon pilihan raya terutamanya selepas PRU pada 2008. Begitulah besarnya Ibrahim Suffian di PR. Khabar angin mengatakan bahawa dialah orang yang menasihati PR supaya tidak menjalankan pilihanraya negeri jika Najib mengumumkan PRU13. Di Amerika, setiap parti politik mempunyai tukang fikir mereka tersendiri. Merdeka Centre pula adalah tukang pusing PR. Tahniah Merdeka Centre! Anda telah berkhidmat dengan jayanya. |
|
Panda Diplomacy
Panda Diplomacy: More Than Just A Symbol Of China-Malaysia’s Close Relations
From 1958 to 1982, China gave away 23 pandas to nine countries to mark the beginning of diplomatic relations. Loans of giant pandas to American and Japanese zoos formed an important part of the diplomacy of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the 1970s, as it marked some of the first cultural exchanges between the People's Republic and the West. This practice has been termed ‘Panda diplomacy’.
Panda, a highly endangered species is a native to central-western and south western China - the Sinchuan Region. It is considered as a symbol of world peace and represents the Yin and Yang concept. In fact, Panda is known to be China's longest serving ambassador as it was presented as a gift to Japan during the Tang Dynasty around 685 AD.
By 1984, however, pandas were no longer given as gifts. Instead, the PRC began to offer pandas to other nations only on 10-year loans, under terms including a fee of up to US$1,000,000 per year and a provision that any cubs born during the loan are the property of the PRC.
Pandas feed on bamboo shoots. It has a low birth rate and is greatly threatened with extinction whereby as at 2004, only 1,600 are believed to be still living in the wild.
Because of this, Panda is considered as a national treasure of China and was one of the five mascots in Beijing Olympics Games 2008.
Taking the significance of the species for the country, China’s decision to lend two pandas for 10 years to Malaysia in itself, symbolizes the significance of China-Malaysia relations.
Nevertheless, during the era of Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia-China relation had been strengthened through a “Ping Pong Diplomacy” in 1974. Ever since, both countries have always maintained good social, political and economic relations.
With this already strong relation, the “Panda Diplomacy” must have brought a deeper meaning than just to mark a lasting good relation. It means China’s recognition of Malaysia's achievement in research and conservation.
In addition to that, by entrusting Malaysia with its national treasure, China is also acknowledging Malaysia’s commitment towards increasing the number of the endangered species.
We believe that China’s friendship, trust and acknowledgment towards Malaysia would lead to more fruitful dealings that would benefit both countries. By gaining the trust of one of the greatest economic power of the world is evidence of a dynamic leadership of our Prime Minister.
Still, it is sad that some Malaysians do not see the significance of Panda Diplomacy, and have to ridicule the government’s call to help name the pandas. While a world’s superpower is showing us their respect, the Malaysians themselves are showing the world of how low their mentalities are.
I bet these same Malaysians are the ones claiming to be loyal, rationale, open-minded citizens though they sounded more like retarded Malaysians.
However, let’s not be bothered by these few retards, but pity them for their poor upbringing.
So, let’s all truly loyal, rationale, open-minded citizens of Malaysia take part in the contest so that we could find the best names for these two treasures of the world, that are now in our care.
From 1958 to 1982, China gave away 23 pandas to nine countries to mark the beginning of diplomatic relations. Loans of giant pandas to American and Japanese zoos formed an important part of the diplomacy of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the 1970s, as it marked some of the first cultural exchanges between the People's Republic and the West. This practice has been termed ‘Panda diplomacy’.
Panda, a highly endangered species is a native to central-western and south western China - the Sinchuan Region. It is considered as a symbol of world peace and represents the Yin and Yang concept. In fact, Panda is known to be China's longest serving ambassador as it was presented as a gift to Japan during the Tang Dynasty around 685 AD.
By 1984, however, pandas were no longer given as gifts. Instead, the PRC began to offer pandas to other nations only on 10-year loans, under terms including a fee of up to US$1,000,000 per year and a provision that any cubs born during the loan are the property of the PRC.
Pandas feed on bamboo shoots. It has a low birth rate and is greatly threatened with extinction whereby as at 2004, only 1,600 are believed to be still living in the wild.
Because of this, Panda is considered as a national treasure of China and was one of the five mascots in Beijing Olympics Games 2008.
Taking the significance of the species for the country, China’s decision to lend two pandas for 10 years to Malaysia in itself, symbolizes the significance of China-Malaysia relations.
Nevertheless, during the era of Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia-China relation had been strengthened through a “Ping Pong Diplomacy” in 1974. Ever since, both countries have always maintained good social, political and economic relations.
With this already strong relation, the “Panda Diplomacy” must have brought a deeper meaning than just to mark a lasting good relation. It means China’s recognition of Malaysia's achievement in research and conservation.
In addition to that, by entrusting Malaysia with its national treasure, China is also acknowledging Malaysia’s commitment towards increasing the number of the endangered species.
We believe that China’s friendship, trust and acknowledgment towards Malaysia would lead to more fruitful dealings that would benefit both countries. By gaining the trust of one of the greatest economic power of the world is evidence of a dynamic leadership of our Prime Minister.
Still, it is sad that some Malaysians do not see the significance of Panda Diplomacy, and have to ridicule the government’s call to help name the pandas. While a world’s superpower is showing us their respect, the Malaysians themselves are showing the world of how low their mentalities are.
I bet these same Malaysians are the ones claiming to be loyal, rationale, open-minded citizens though they sounded more like retarded Malaysians.
However, let’s not be bothered by these few retards, but pity them for their poor upbringing.
So, let’s all truly loyal, rationale, open-minded citizens of Malaysia take part in the contest so that we could find the best names for these two treasures of the world, that are now in our care.
PRORAM TERKINI
JUARA RAKYAT
Subpoena: Suaram Is The Biggest Liar In Malaysia
Subpoena: Suaram Is The Biggest Liar In Malaysia
After a line of lies made by Suaram's Coordinator (PKR), Cynthia Gabriel in June 15, 2012 regarding the notice of subpoena which was brought up by France's court on the purchase of Scorpene submarines was revealed, Malaysiakini yesterday quoted a source from the NGO to defend Cynthia;s statement with the excuse saying,"The subpoena is not being sent here and the process would take a few days. We do not have the exact information on how long the process would take."
Does it even make any sense that from June 15 until today (June 22), since Cynthia made the statement, the subpoena is still yet to get to the person that they suspected, Jasbir Singh Chahl?
We are not in the yesteryear where everything has to be done manually. Today, we have all the technologies. So, it is quite impossible that the subpoena that was mentioned by Cynthia to still be 'in process'.
The person who was said that would receive the subpoena have mentioned that he did not receive any subpoena from France. If that is not enough, a representative from French Embassy to Malaysia, Laurent Lemarchand (First Counsellor) denied that court from France has made Subpoenas to Jasbir like what was stated by Cynthia.
Not just Jasbir, in fact, there are no subpoenas that are made to any rakyat in this country regarding the case.
For information, the role of French Embassy in this matter is really important because the legal procedures in France is different than Malaysia. If what Cynthia said is true, French Embassy would be the first to know about it, even before the Foreign Ministry and Royal Malaysian Police (RMP).
This is because, according to the legal procedure in France, they do not need witnesses to attend at the Court during investigation, all they need is to answer questions that the Court has set.
Yes, investigation, because like what Suaram had stated in Bangkok on May 30, the investigation for this case is still going on and it would take between 2 to 3 years. That is why it is quite weird for Suaram to say that the investigation is still going on (in Bangkok), and by June 15, they stated that subpoenas are on its way.
How can they come up with subpoena when there is no trial at all?
That is what we meant when we say that Suaram is Malaysia's number one liar, other than the confusion that they have made within Pakatan Rakyat. Their arguments even contradicted among one another. The reason is only to confuse rakyat to create sensational stories to gain funds, as if to cover for the cost of Ops Scorpene 2.0.
This is not as different as when Anwar announced as if a few MPs and former Sabah UMNO leaders would jump out of the party when he visited the state in June 10, 2012. Just like Suaram, on that night, they did a fundraising event for PKR's election preparation in Sabah.
This is not the first time this has happen, on September 16, 2008, a few minor cases after the date showed that Pakatan Rakyat is an illegal political party who loves to sensationalize stories to confuse rakyat. We can never forget how Anwar often mentioned that the election is corrupt that triggered Bersih 1, 2, and 3 but at the same time, he stated that the opposition would win all seats in the Parliament.
We can see there that how can he say that UMNO/BN cheat in elections but he said that Pakatan could win?
That only mean that rakyat should defend BN. BN might not be perfect (no one is), but BN never say that it is the ultimate party, and at the same time tries to fool rakyat.
After a line of lies made by Suaram's Coordinator (PKR), Cynthia Gabriel in June 15, 2012 regarding the notice of subpoena which was brought up by France's court on the purchase of Scorpene submarines was revealed, Malaysiakini yesterday quoted a source from the NGO to defend Cynthia;s statement with the excuse saying,"The subpoena is not being sent here and the process would take a few days. We do not have the exact information on how long the process would take."
Does it even make any sense that from June 15 until today (June 22), since Cynthia made the statement, the subpoena is still yet to get to the person that they suspected, Jasbir Singh Chahl?
We are not in the yesteryear where everything has to be done manually. Today, we have all the technologies. So, it is quite impossible that the subpoena that was mentioned by Cynthia to still be 'in process'.
The person who was said that would receive the subpoena have mentioned that he did not receive any subpoena from France. If that is not enough, a representative from French Embassy to Malaysia, Laurent Lemarchand (First Counsellor) denied that court from France has made Subpoenas to Jasbir like what was stated by Cynthia.
Not just Jasbir, in fact, there are no subpoenas that are made to any rakyat in this country regarding the case.
For information, the role of French Embassy in this matter is really important because the legal procedures in France is different than Malaysia. If what Cynthia said is true, French Embassy would be the first to know about it, even before the Foreign Ministry and Royal Malaysian Police (RMP).
This is because, according to the legal procedure in France, they do not need witnesses to attend at the Court during investigation, all they need is to answer questions that the Court has set.
Yes, investigation, because like what Suaram had stated in Bangkok on May 30, the investigation for this case is still going on and it would take between 2 to 3 years. That is why it is quite weird for Suaram to say that the investigation is still going on (in Bangkok), and by June 15, they stated that subpoenas are on its way.
How can they come up with subpoena when there is no trial at all?
That is what we meant when we say that Suaram is Malaysia's number one liar, other than the confusion that they have made within Pakatan Rakyat. Their arguments even contradicted among one another. The reason is only to confuse rakyat to create sensational stories to gain funds, as if to cover for the cost of Ops Scorpene 2.0.
This is not as different as when Anwar announced as if a few MPs and former Sabah UMNO leaders would jump out of the party when he visited the state in June 10, 2012. Just like Suaram, on that night, they did a fundraising event for PKR's election preparation in Sabah.
This is not the first time this has happen, on September 16, 2008, a few minor cases after the date showed that Pakatan Rakyat is an illegal political party who loves to sensationalize stories to confuse rakyat. We can never forget how Anwar often mentioned that the election is corrupt that triggered Bersih 1, 2, and 3 but at the same time, he stated that the opposition would win all seats in the Parliament.
We can see there that how can he say that UMNO/BN cheat in elections but he said that Pakatan could win?
That only mean that rakyat should defend BN. BN might not be perfect (no one is), but BN never say that it is the ultimate party, and at the same time tries to fool rakyat.
bantuan mayang p64
ops..
SPRM Tolong Siasat Keluarga Faekah Husin
Belum reda isu percakaran dalam PKR Selangor kini timbul pula dakwaan membabitkan Setiausaha Politik MB Selangor, Faekah Husin yang dikatakan telah mempengaruhi keputusan pengambilan panel peguam oleh Permodalan Negeri Selangor Berhad (PNSB).
Berdasarkan pendedahan oleh Sel13.Com, Faekah dilaporkan telah menggunakan kepala surat Pejabat Menteri Besar Selangor untuk menyokong permohonan anak saudaranya yang memiliki kepentingan dalam firma guaman Sidrek Zeenat Asyiqin & Associates.
Hasil semakan oleh portal tersebut mendapati, Zeenat Asyiqin Binti Dato’ Ahmad Zaki yang merupakan rakan kongsi firma guaman tersebut adalah anak kepada abang kandung Faekah, Dato' Ahmad Zaki Bin Husin.
Sekadar untuk rekod, Dato' Ahmad Zaki Bin Husin adalah bekas Ketua Pengarah BPR bermula dari 24 Mac 1999 hingga 23 Mac 2001. Sekarang beliau adalah Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam.
Portal tersebut turut melampirkan dua bukti bertulis bagi menyokong pendedahan berkenaan yakni surat serahan tangan yang diterima oleh Faekah diikuti dengan surat sokongan dari Faekah kepada PNSB.
Pada Julai 2010, MB Selangor, Khalid Ibrahim pernah mengeluarkan arahan melarang pihak berkepentingan dalam kerajaan negeri daripada mengeluarkan sebarang surat sokongan terhadap mana-mana permohonan tender atau kerja.
Jelas terdapat kontradiks diantara arahan tersebut dengan situasi terkini yang membabitkan Faekah.
Timbul persoalan yang agak mengasak minda kita, adakah dalam kes Faekah ini polisi dan arahan tersebut terkecuali?
Apakah Khalid Ibrahim sengaja memejamkan mata membenarkan penyalahgunaan kepala surat pejabatnya semata-mata untuk membantu sanak saudara dan ahli keluarga Setiausaha Politiknya?
Apapun, amat wajar untuk pihak berkuasa khususnya SPRM memberi perhatian serius dalam isu ini dan melakukan siasatan rapi terhadap Faekah dan ahli keluarganya demi kepentingan umum.
Soal besar atau kecil nilai sesuatu kontrak yang diperolehi bukan persoalan kerana sebarang unsur salah guna kuasa apatah lagi untuk kepentingan kroni dan ahli keluarga sendiri tidak boleh dipandang sepi.
Belum reda isu percakaran dalam PKR Selangor kini timbul pula dakwaan membabitkan Setiausaha Politik MB Selangor, Faekah Husin yang dikatakan telah mempengaruhi keputusan pengambilan panel peguam oleh Permodalan Negeri Selangor Berhad (PNSB).
Berdasarkan pendedahan oleh Sel13.Com, Faekah dilaporkan telah menggunakan kepala surat Pejabat Menteri Besar Selangor untuk menyokong permohonan anak saudaranya yang memiliki kepentingan dalam firma guaman Sidrek Zeenat Asyiqin & Associates.
Hasil semakan oleh portal tersebut mendapati, Zeenat Asyiqin Binti Dato’ Ahmad Zaki yang merupakan rakan kongsi firma guaman tersebut adalah anak kepada abang kandung Faekah, Dato' Ahmad Zaki Bin Husin.
Sekadar untuk rekod, Dato' Ahmad Zaki Bin Husin adalah bekas Ketua Pengarah BPR bermula dari 24 Mac 1999 hingga 23 Mac 2001. Sekarang beliau adalah Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman di Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam.
Portal tersebut turut melampirkan dua bukti bertulis bagi menyokong pendedahan berkenaan yakni surat serahan tangan yang diterima oleh Faekah diikuti dengan surat sokongan dari Faekah kepada PNSB.
Pada Julai 2010, MB Selangor, Khalid Ibrahim pernah mengeluarkan arahan melarang pihak berkepentingan dalam kerajaan negeri daripada mengeluarkan sebarang surat sokongan terhadap mana-mana permohonan tender atau kerja.
Jelas terdapat kontradiks diantara arahan tersebut dengan situasi terkini yang membabitkan Faekah.
Timbul persoalan yang agak mengasak minda kita, adakah dalam kes Faekah ini polisi dan arahan tersebut terkecuali?
Apakah Khalid Ibrahim sengaja memejamkan mata membenarkan penyalahgunaan kepala surat pejabatnya semata-mata untuk membantu sanak saudara dan ahli keluarga Setiausaha Politiknya?
Apapun, amat wajar untuk pihak berkuasa khususnya SPRM memberi perhatian serius dalam isu ini dan melakukan siasatan rapi terhadap Faekah dan ahli keluarganya demi kepentingan umum.
Soal besar atau kecil nilai sesuatu kontrak yang diperolehi bukan persoalan kerana sebarang unsur salah guna kuasa apatah lagi untuk kepentingan kroni dan ahli keluarga sendiri tidak boleh dipandang sepi.